In a startling episode that occurred in Rajasthan, a physician at Jhunjhunu’s Dhankar Hospital removed a patient’s functioning kidney by accident rather than the non-functioning one. The Rajasthani government acted promptly and decisively after this serious mistake was discovered. Without delay, the state cancelled the hospital’s registration and initiated the process of withdrawing its inclusion in multiple government health programs.
The patient, a woman, had her left kidney removed rather than her right, according to Shubhra Singh, Additional Chief Secretary of the Medical and Health Department. The government acted swiftly to rectify the error since it was seen to be quite serious. One of the first actions was the hospital’s clinical establishment registration being canceled. Singh stressed that action is being taken by the state to remove the facility from various government health programs. In addition, the hospital may be seized by the government. Singh announced that a five-person investigating team has been assembled to conduct a comprehensive investigation into the incident, adhering to the directives of the Supreme Court.
This occurrence that occurred in Rajasthan is not unique. At the Government Medical College Hospital in Kerala, there was another alarming instance of medical malfeasance. Rather than operating on the girl’s finger, a 4-year-old girl had surgery on her tongue. Due to a mix-up, the girl’s tongue was accidentally operated on during the planned procedure on her hand. The mistake was found by the victim’s relatives, who were further distressed when they saw cotton put in the child’s mouth after surgery. It was discovered that the procedure had been done wrongly upon closer examination.
These occurrences demonstrate how important it is that medical treatments include rigorous inspections and verification procedures. Errors like these can seriously harm patients and damage the public’s confidence in medical facilities. Basic but crucial mistakes in surgical practice—proper patient identification, surgical site verification, and standard operating procedure observance—were made in both cases.
The incident that occurred in Rajasthan specifically highlights the significance of pre-operative checks and balances. The fact that the incorrect kidney was removed points to a systematic breakdown in the hospital’s protocols in addition to the operating surgeon’s error. Pre-operative imaging and numerous medical specialists’ verification are common procedures meant to avert such mistakes. By taking swift action to revoke the hospital’s registration and empanelment, the government hopes to discourage future establishments and emphasize the need of being watchful and adhering to medical standards.
Similar problems with verification and procedural adherence are indicated by a child’s wrong-site surgery in Kerala. Because there is a greater risk involved, surgery on young infants needs special attention and several levels of verification. The patient’s relatives found the problem before the medical team did, indicating a lack of communication and post-operative care.
Important concerns concerning medical staff supervision and training are also brought up by both cases. To make sure that such errors don’t happen again, strict adherence to safety procedures, frequent audits, and ongoing education are necessary. To protect patient safety, these instances necessitate a review of present procedures and the adoption of stronger policies. Hospitals need to emphasize the need of a culture of safety in which all patient care procedures are double-checked and complacency is not tolerated.
SOURCE:
MEDICAL DIALOGUES