In a significant development, the Rajasthan police have arrested Dr. Sanjay Dhankar, a doctor from Jhunjhunu who had been absconding for the past eight days after allegedly removing a patient’s healthy right kidney. The arrest took place in Rajkot, Gujarat, marking a critical step in addressing the grave allegations of medical negligence that have shocked the community.
After being detained and brought before the court, Dr. Dhankar was taken into police custody. According to Kotwali Station House Officer (SHO) Pawan Kumar, the physician was placed under police remand for a single day. Sections 337 and 338 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) deal with inflicting hurt by act endangering life or personal safety of others and causing grievous hurt by act endangering life or personal safety of others, respectively, and under these sections a FIR was filed against him. The seriousness of the alleged medical malpractice is reflected in these charges.
The episode in question allegedly happened on May 15, when a woman called Eid Banu had her healthy right kidney removed by Dr. Dhankar. The patient’s family was instantly outraged by this awful deed. To make matters worse, they said that the hospital administration never even gave them back the kidney that had been removed. Banu’s cousin Sehzad Ali claimed the physicians told them the kidney had been “thrown in the garbage,” which made them even more distraught and incredulous.
Dr. Dhankar denied the accusations made against him, stating that the kidney was in fact given to the patient’s family. He asserted that there was video evidence to back up his claims, showing that the kidney was donated to the family per protocol. The matter became more complicated and tense due to the divergent reports between the family’s allegations and the doctor’s remark.
As soon as this incidence came to light, the district government moved quickly. Chinmayee Gopal, the district collector, quickly established an inquiry committee to look into the situation. The committee’s scathing conclusions that Dr. Dhankar had engaged in medical negligence were reached. As a result of this discovery, a case was filed on May 30 based on the declaration given by Eid Banu. Because of the severity of her condition and the requirement for specialist medical care, Banu was later transferred to the Sawai Man Singh (SMS) Hospital in Jaipur for additional treatment.
Apart from initiating criminal procedures, the district administration implemented additional measures to tackle the issue. In a letter to the medical department, the district collector suggested that Dr. Dhankar’s Rajasthan Medical Council registration be canceled. This proposal emphasizes how serious the wrongdoing was and how important it is to make sure that similar careless incidents don’t happen again. By holding the guilty party accountable, the district collector’s action seeks to shield future patients from damage.
In addition, the hospital where the event occurred has been severely impacted. A police officer stated that the hospital’s registration has been revoked and it has been confiscated. The authorities’ resolve to upholding rigorous restrictions to protect patient safety and uphold high standards of medical practice is shown in this decisive move.
Significant concerns about patient safety and responsibility in the medical community have been raised by the case of Dr. Sanjay Dhankar. There has been a great deal of outrage and anxiety about the claims that a healthy kidney was removed and that it was thrown away like trash. The matter has become more complex due to the divergent accounts provided by the patient’s family and the doctor, underscoring the necessity for an open and honest investigation to determine the truth.
The district administration’s and law enforcement agencies’ prompt action shows that they are committed to treating medical malpractice seriously. The establishment of the inquiry committee, the ensuing conclusions, and the legal procedures against Dr. Dhankar demonstrate a methodical approach to guaranteeing justice and averting similar carelessness in the future. The hospital’s registration was canceled as a message to other healthcare facilities about the repercussions of disregarding appropriate medical standards and procedures.
This incident also emphasizes how crucial it is for medical practitioners to have clear lines of communication and accurate documentation. Dr. Dhankar’s assertion that a video clip shows the kidney being given to the family raises the possibility that effective documentation and communication are essential to settling these kinds of conflicts. Preventing misunderstandings and fostering trust in the healthcare system can be achieved by making sure that all medical procedures are meticulously documented and that patients and their families are fully informed about every element of their treatment.
Significant strides have been made in the direction of justice for Eid Banu and her family with the arrest of Dr. Dhankar and the actions against the hospital. The current judicial process will clarify more case specifics and assist in deciding whether punishments are suitable for the claimed negligence. The Rajasthan Medical Council’s involvement and the probable cancellation of Dr. Dhankar’s registration will be essential in maintaining professional standards in the medical community.
